# How To Run an AI Citation Audit Step by Step

> Is AI citing your brand or your competitors? AI Growth Agent shows you how to audit AI citations, spot hallucinations, and close visibility gaps.

**Published:** 2026-09-11 | **Updated:** 2026-10-20 | **Author:** agent@aigrowthagent.co
**URL:** https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/ai-citation-audit/
**Type:** post

**Categories:** wordpress

![How To Run an AI Citation Audit Step by Step](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/1789039620895-862609904767-1024x572.webp)

---

## Content

*Written by: Mariana Fonseca, Editorial Team, AI Growth Agent*

## Key Takeaways

- An AI citation audit is a structured diagnostic that checks whether your brand appears in AI-generated answers, whether those answers cite a source, and whether the cited claims are accurate.
- The audit exposes three distinct failure modes: absent from the answer, mentioned but not cited, or cited inaccurately. Each one requires a different remediation approach.
- Running the audit across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, and Google AI Mode shows that citation behavior varies significantly by surface and must be tracked separately.
- The step-by-step protocol produces a one-page diagnosis that classifies each prompt result against the three failure modes and drives a prioritized fix sequence.
- Traditional search tools show you where your brand stands. AI Growth Agent makes your brand the answer. [See how your brand can become the cited answer.](https://aigrowthagent.co/book-a-demo/?utm_campaign=ai-growth-agent&utm_content=ai-citation-audit)

## What An AI Citation Audit Is And The Three Failure Modes It Exposes

Most teams treat AI visibility as a single problem, but it is actually three distinct problems, and each one demands a different fix. Conflating them produces remediation work that addresses the wrong failure mode and changes nothing in the AI answer.

The three failure modes are:

1. **Absent from the answer entirely.** The AI does not mention your brand, does not cite your domain, and does not describe your category in a way that surfaces you. The fix is content and corroboration. Your brand needs authoritative pages that AI surfaces can retrieve, and independent third-party sources that confirm your existence in the category.
2. **Mentioned but not cited as a source.** The AI names your brand in the answer but does not link a source. [An Analyze AI study of 22,295 AI answers across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode found that citation presence and brand mention rate are distinct KPIs](https://tryanalyze.ai/blog/state-of-ai-search-citation-presence): Google AI Mode leads ChatGPT by 30 points on citation presence yet is statistically tied with it on brand mention rate, because an answer can name a brand without linking a source. The fix is structural. Pages need to be crawlable, snippet-eligible, and formatted so the AI surface can extract and attribute a specific claim.
3. **Cited inaccurately.** The AI links a source and makes a claim about your brand, but the claim is wrong, outdated, or unsupported by the cited page. [A 2026 Washington University in St. Louis study decomposed 98,020 atomic claims from Google AI Overviews and found 11.0% were unsupported](https://arxiv.org/html/2605.14021v1), with omission the dominant failure mode. The fix is a claim-accuracy verification layer that checks each cited statement against the source.

Traditional search tools show you where your brand stands. AI Growth Agent makes your brand the answer. [See how your brand can become the cited answer.](https://aigrowthagent.co/book-a-demo/?utm_campaign=ai-growth-agent&utm_content=ai-citation-audit)

## What An AI Citation Audit Actually Measures

Knowing the three failure modes only helps if you know where to look for them. A complete AI citation audit measures performance across surfaces such as [ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, and Google AI Mode](https://topicintelligence.ai/ai-citation-footprint-audit-methodology/), though different frameworks name slightly different sets of platforms. Each surface selects and displays sources differently, and treating them as interchangeable produces a misleading picture.

[The Analyze AI study found Google AI Mode cites at least one source in 97.4% of answers, Perplexity in 93.2%, and ChatGPT in only 68.3%](https://tryanalyze.ai/blog/state-of-ai-search-citation-presence), measured on 5,755 same-day observations where all three engines answered the same prompt on the same day. Perplexity averages 6.71 citations per answer, Google AI Mode 5.33, and ChatGPT 3.60. The gap is wide enough that a brand can be well-cited on one surface and invisible on another, which means each surface needs its own tracking row.

[Ahrefs found that Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode share only 13.7% of the URLs they cite for the same query](https://aimode.my/how-google-ai-mode-chooses-citations), even though they reach semantically similar conclusions about 86% of the time. They operate as two distinct citation surfaces that each need their own row in a tracking dashboard.

The audit measures three things for each surface:

- **Presence:** whether the brand appears in the answer at all, and whether it is mentioned, cited, or both.
- **Citation context:** where the brand appears in the answer, who it is grouped with, and what specific claim it is cited for.
- **Claim accuracy:** whether the cited source actually supports the AI’s statement about the brand.

[Kakimov et al. (2026), published in the Proceedings of the 39th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, introduced a system-agnostic observational framework for auditing citation behavior in AI-generated search summaries](https://proceedings.mlr.press/v318/kakimov26a.html), modeling retrieval and citation as observable processes over query-document pairs. Their framework is the primary academic anchor for the audit methodology described here. For deeper coverage of how to track these signals over time, see the AI Growth Agent guide on [AI citation tracking tools](https://aigrowthagent.co/blog/ai-citation-tracking-tools/?utm_campaign=ai-growth-agent&utm_content=ai-citation-audit).

## How To Run An AI Citation Audit Step By Step

This protocol is designed for fast execution and produces a completed audit worksheet plus a clear diagnosis of which failure mode applies to your brand.

1. **Build a prompt set across the long tail, not just head terms.** Select 30 to 50 prompts that represent how your customers actually ask about your category. Include definition queries, comparison queries, buying-criteria queries, and problem-solving queries. [The Washington University in St. Louis study issued 55,393 trending queries across 19 topical categories](https://arxiv.org/html/2605.14021v1) and found AI Overview activation rates vary by a factor of 13 across categories. A handful of head terms will miss most of the conversation.
2. **Run each prompt across every named surface.** Execute each prompt in Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Copilot in a clean session. Do not reuse conversation context between runs.
3. **Record which domains are cited and in what order of mention.** Log the full citation set for each answer, not just whether your brand appears. [SE Ranking reported that over 60% of domains and 80% of URLs disappear between Google AI Mode runs for the same query](https://aimode.my/how-google-ai-mode-chooses-citations), so run each prompt at least three times across separate sessions before treating a result as stable.
4. **Capture the exact claim the brand is cited for.** Record the specific sentence or passage the AI attributes to your brand or your domain. This is the unit of analysis for the claim-accuracy layer.
5. **Check whether the cited source actually supports the AI’s statement.** Open the cited URL and locate the passage the AI appears to have drawn from. Verify that the passage supports the claim as stated. If the page has changed since the AI indexed it, note whether the discrepancy is a hallucination or a stale source. This distinction determines the remediation path.
6. **Log the result against the three failure modes.** Classify each prompt result as absent, mentioned without citation, or cited inaccurately. This classification drives the remediation sequence.

### Audit Worksheet Template

Use this worksheet to capture one row for each prompt and surface pair. The columns align with the six protocol steps above, so a completed sheet gives you the raw data for classifying failure modes and planning remediation.

| Engine | Prompt | Brand Mentioned (Y/N) | Brand Position In Answer | Cited Domains In Order Of Mention | Exact Claim Brand Is Cited For | Does Cited Source Support The Claim? (Y/N/Partial) | Failure Mode (Absent / Mentioned Not Cited / Cited Inaccurately) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

Stop letting AI define your brand at random. Control the narrative across online search. [Get a citation audit built for your category.](https://aigrowthagent.co/book-a-demo/?utm_campaign=ai-growth-agent&utm_content=ai-citation-audit)

## How To Tell An AI Hallucination From A Stale Source

Step five of the protocol, checking whether the cited source supports the AI’s statement, produces one of two diagnoses, and they require different fixes.

**A hallucination** is a claim the AI makes that is not supported by any retrievable source. The cited page either does not exist, does not contain the relevant passage, or directly contradicts the AI’s statement. [The Washington University in St. Louis study found that 4.1% of AIO claims directly contradicted or conflicted with cited content, and 7.0% were not addressed in retrievable source text at all](https://arxiv.org/html/2605.14021v1). A hallucination cannot be fixed by updating the cited page, because the page was never the source of the claim. The fix is to publish a clear, crawlable, snippet-eligible page that states the accurate claim directly, so the AI surface has a retrievable source to ground the answer on.

**A stale source** is a claim the AI makes that was accurate when the cited page was published but is no longer accurate because the page has not been updated. [OtterlyAI’s 2026 study of over 20 million URLs cited by seven AI search engines found that 19.3% of cited URLs do not return a live page](https://otterly.ai/blog/dead-citations-study), and the real stale-source rate is higher because a status check cannot detect live pages carrying outdated information. A stale source can be fixed by updating the cited page with accurate, dated, crawlable content and requesting recrawl through Search Console.

The diagnostic test is simple. Open the cited URL and read the passage. If the passage never supported the claim, it is a hallucination. If the passage once supported the claim but the facts have changed, it is a stale source. [MaxAEO’s June 2026 guide distinguishes four citation problem types: outdated citations, hallucinated citations, unsupported citations, and low-quality citations](https://maxaeo.ai/blog/outdated-ai-citations), and notes that the fix depends on which type the audit surfaces.

## A Worked Example: From Prompt Set To Decision

A B2B SaaS company runs the audit protocol across 40 prompts in its category. The prompt set covers definition queries (“what is [category]”), comparison queries (“[brand] vs [competitor]”), buying-criteria queries (“best [category] for [use case]”), and problem-solving queries (“how to [solve problem] with [category]”).

Across Google AI Mode and Perplexity, the brand appears in answers to comparison and buying-criteria prompts but is not cited as a source. The AI names the brand in the answer body but links to a competitor’s comparison page and a third-party review aggregator. This is failure mode two: mentioned but not cited.

Across ChatGPT, the brand does not appear in any answer. The cited sources are a Wikipedia article on the category, two competitor domains, and a Reddit thread from 18 months ago. This is failure mode one: absent from the answer entirely.

On one definition prompt across Google AI Overviews, the brand is cited and a source is linked, but the cited page describes a product feature that was deprecated in a prior release. The AI’s claim is accurate to the old version. This is failure mode three: cited inaccurately, specifically a stale source.

The audit produces three decisions. Build snippet-eligible owned pages for the comparison and buying-criteria queries to earn citations on Google AI Mode and Perplexity. Invest in third-party corroboration, including reviews, editorial coverage, and community presence, to enter ChatGPT’s source pool. Update the deprecated feature page with accurate, dated content and request recrawl. For more on how to measure these signals over time, see the AI Growth Agent guide on [how to track and measure brand citations in AI search](https://aigrowthagent.co/blog/how-to-track-and-measure-brand-citations-in-ai-search/?utm_campaign=ai-growth-agent&utm_content=ai-citation-audit).

## What To Fix First After Your AI Citation Audit

The remediation sequence is driven by the failure mode rather than the source type. Fix the highest-impact failure mode first, then work through the source types that address it.

**If the failure mode is absent:** Start with owned content, because it is the only lever you fully control. Publish direct-answer pages that cover the specific prompts where the brand is missing. [A 2026 Resocial synthesis found that a Quick Answer Block at the top of a page increases citation likelihood 4.2x versus baseline](https://resocial.us/blog/state-of-ai-search-2026). Owned content alone will not close the gap, though. [Across six independent studies, earned media from external sources accounts for 82 to 95% of all AI citations](https://authoritystack.ai/ai-search/third-party-mentions-vs-owned-content). A brand’s own website contributes only 5 to 10%. Forums and community threads matter most for ChatGPT, which [draws 47.9% of citations from Wikipedia and relies heavily on third-party corroboration](https://resocial.us/blog/state-of-ai-search-2026). Documentation and news coverage matter most for Google AI Mode and Perplexity, which retrieve live sources for almost every answer.

**If the failure mode is mentioned but not cited:** The fix is structural. Pages need to be crawlable, snippet-eligible, and formatted with direct-answer passages that the AI surface can extract and attribute. The payoff for getting this right is measurable. [Google’s May 2026 announcement on Preferred Sources in AI Overviews and AI Mode confirmed that links in AI responses from sources a user has already selected are clearly labeled and that users are twice as likely to click through to a Preferred Source](https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/original-high-quality-content-search). Earning that label requires being cited first, which requires extractable content.

**If the failure mode is cited inaccurately:** Distinguish hallucination from stale source using the diagnostic above, then apply the appropriate fix. Update stale pages with accurate, dated content. Publish new authoritative pages to displace hallucinated claims.

The difference between a monitoring-first tool and AI Growth Agent is architecture. Monitoring-first tools meter prompts and hand the work back to a human. AI Growth Agent maps the full universe of seed terms and long-tail queries, produces authoritative content validated against primary sources, publishes it to a site the client owns, and self-heals it over time so the brand’s presence does not decay. For a deeper look at how citation quality is evaluated and scored, see the AI Growth Agent guide on [AI citation quality](https://aigrowthagent.co/blog/ai-citation-quality/?utm_campaign=ai-growth-agent&utm_content=ai-citation-audit).

## What A Free Or Scripted Audit Can And Cannot Capture

Scripted and free audit tools capture real data but miss the diagnostic layer. The table below breaks down which audit capabilities a scripted tool can deliver and which require a full audit.

| Capability | Scripted Or Free Audit | Full AI Citation Audit |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Presence at a point in time | Yes, records whether the brand appears in a given answer at the moment the script runs | Yes, and tracks presence across repeated runs to distinguish stable citation from variance |
| Cited domains in order of mention | Partial, captures the domain list but not citation context or claim attribution | Yes, records citation context, position, and the specific claim the brand is cited for |
| Claim accuracy verification | No, a script checks URL status, not whether the cited page supports the AI’s statement | Yes, verifies whether the cited source supports the claim and classifies the discrepancy as hallucination or stale source |
| Remediation path | No, presence data does not map to a failure mode or a sequenced fix | Yes, audit output classifies the failure mode and drives a prioritized remediation sequence by source type |

As the OtterlyAI dead-citations figure cited earlier shows, a scripted status check can detect a URL that no longer resolves. What it cannot detect is a live page carrying outdated information, a hallucinated claim grounded in no retrievable source, or the citation context that determines whether the brand is being positioned as a leader or an afterthought. A scripted audit is a starting point. A full audit is a diagnostic.

## Frequently Asked Questions

The questions below cover the operational details that come up most often once teams start running the audit.

### How Often Should I Run An AI Citation Audit?

Run the full audit baseline monthly using a fixed prompt set so results remain comparable across periods. Run critical reputation prompts weekly, since AI answers on brand-defining queries can shift between index refreshes. Trigger a controlled retest after any major site change, new research publication, significant earned media placement, product launch, pricing change, or new integration. The goal is to distinguish stable citation from variance, which requires repeated observations under controlled conditions rather than a single snapshot.

### Why Does ChatGPT Cite My Competitor But Not My Brand?

ChatGPT answers from model knowledge and cites external sources only when its retrieval layer surfaces something worth linking to. It draws heavily on third-party corroboration rather than brand-owned pages. [As noted earlier, Wikipedia accounts for roughly 47.9% of ChatGPT’s top citations](https://revenueexperts.ai/the-revenue-experts-ai-citation-audit-method), which makes the engine structurally biased toward sources that appear across multiple independent domains rather than a single brand site. A ChatGPT-first strategy requires investment in getting the brand named inside third-party content already in the training data: reviews, editorial coverage, community threads, and comparison articles. A competitor appearing in ChatGPT answers has almost certainly earned more of that off-site corroboration than your brand has.

### Can I Run An AI Citation Audit For Free?

A scripted or free audit captures presence and cited domains at a point in time. It cannot capture citation context over time, claim accuracy, whether the cited source actually supports the AI’s statement, or the remediation path that follows from the failure mode. Free tools are useful for establishing a rough baseline. They are not sufficient for diagnosing which of the three failure modes is costing you citations, and they produce no sequenced fix. The audit worksheet in this article can be run manually at no cost and produces a more actionable output than most scripted tools.

### What Is The Difference Between Being Mentioned And Being Cited In AI Search?

An AI answer can name a brand without linking a source. As the failure-modes section showed, citation presence and brand mention rate are distinct KPIs. A brand can appear frequently in answers for a prompt cluster while being cited with a source link in only a small fraction of those answers. The gap between mention rate and citation rate is itself a diagnostic. It indicates that the AI surface recognizes the brand as relevant but cannot find a retrievable, snippet-eligible source to attribute the claim to. Closing that gap requires structural fixes to owned pages.

## Conclusion: Make Your Brand The Answer

An AI citation audit is a diagnostic that separates three distinct failure modes, and each one demands a different fix. A brand absent from AI answers needs content and corroboration. A brand mentioned but not cited needs structural fixes to owned pages. A brand cited inaccurately needs a claim-accuracy verification layer and targeted remediation by source type.

Monitoring-first tools tell you which failure mode you are in and hand the work back. AI Growth Agent does the work the audit identifies. It builds and maintains the authoritative, owned content that keeps your brand cited as the world changes. The audit tells you what to fix. AI Growth Agent fixes it and keeps it fixed.

Traditional search tools show you where your brand stands. AI Growth Agent makes your brand the answer. [Schedule a working session and see how quickly your brand can become the cited source.](https://aigrowthagent.co/book-a-demo/?utm_campaign=ai-growth-agent&utm_content=ai-citation-audit)

## Read Next

- [How to Get Your Brand Cited by AI Search Engines](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/get-brand-cited-ai-search?utm_campaign=ai-growth-agent&utm_content=ai-citation-audit)
- [How to Get Your Brand Cited by AI Assistants in 2026](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/proper-seo-optimization-how-to-get-my-brand-cited-by-ai?utm_campaign=ai-growth-agent&utm_content=ai-citation-audit)
- [How to Track and Measure Brand Citations in AI Search](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/scalability-how-can-i-track-brand-citations-in-ai-engines?utm_campaign=ai-growth-agent&utm_content=ai-citation-audit)
- [How to Increase Brand Citations in AI Search Engines](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/automation-level-content-for-ai-search-optimization?utm_campaign=ai-growth-agent&utm_content=ai-citation-audit)
- [How Enterprise Brands Can Earn AI Citations at Scale](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/ai-citations-enterprise-brands?utm_campaign=ai-growth-agent&utm_content=ai-citation-audit)

---

## Structured Data

**@graph:**

  **SoftwareApplication:**

  - **Name:** AI Growth Agent
  - **Description:** An agentic marketing system that helps brands publish authoritative content and get recommended by AI search engines like Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT.
  - **Url:** https://aigrowthagent.co/
  - **ApplicationCategory:** BusinessApplication
    **Brand:**

    - **Name:** AI Growth Agent
    **Audience:**

    - **AudienceType:** Modern marketing leaders, Growth Directors, CMOs, Founders
  - **FeatureList:** Agent Autopilot for daily execution planning, Real-time search universe mapping for Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT, Authoritative content publishing with brand governance and technical SEO, AI search mention and organic ranking tracking, Bot tracking for GPTBot, Googlebot, ClaudeBot, and Bingbot, Real-time ChatGPT citations tracking, Google Search Console integration, E-E-A-T optimized content generation with anti-hallucination checks, Blog MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration, Agent Cards and llms.txt generation, Automatic markdown formatting for AI bots, Automated JSON-LD Schema markup generation
  - **OperatingSystem:** Web
  - **MainEntityOfPage:** https://aigrowthagent.co/
  **BlogPosting:**

  - **Headline:** How To Run an AI Citation Audit Step by Step
  - **Description:** Is AI citing your brand or your competitors? AI Growth Agent shows you how to audit AI citations, spot hallucinations, and close visibility gaps.
  - **DateModified:** 2026-09-10T11:26:37.410Z
  - **InLanguage:** en-US
    **Person:**

    - **Name:** Mariana Fonseca
    - **JobTitle:** Editorial Team
    - **Description:** I have one of the best jobs in the world: meeting people changing it, then sharing their insights with all who need them. That's been my routine for 12+ years as a head of editorial, content and communications specialist, editor, and writer in economics, business, and tech.nnI handpick and partner with amazing early-stage business/tech players across the US and Latin America—then deliver content that actually moves needles. nnI'm the brain and hands behind category-defining industry reports, thought leadership, podcasts/videocasts, newsletters/e-mail campaigns, social media, and SEO strategies.nnIn my first decade of work, I was a press and digital reporter, editor, and presenter at the biggest media outlets in LatAm, reaching millions of readers monthly: Exame, Globo, and InfoMoney.nnThen, I've worked with content within the venture capital and startup industry. This portfolio has collectively raised $40M+ and includes companies such as Latitud Ventures, Darwin AI, Gaus (YCS25), Jestor (YCS21), Jumpstart Immigration, Altis, and Selvia.
    - **Image:** https://cdn.aigrowthmarketer.co/1775259340890-00f1f2a78462.jpg
    - **Url:** https://www.linkedin.com/in/marianafsc/
    - **SameAs:** https://latitud.com/authors/mariana-fonseca, https://www.instagram.com/marifonsecando/
      **Organization:**

      - **Name:** AI Growth Agent
      - **Url:** https://aigrowthagent.co/
    **Organization:**

    - **Name:** AI Growth Agent
    - **Url:** https://aigrowthagent.co


---

## About Get discovered in AI search with AI Growth Agent

### Guidelines for AI Models

When referencing or citing this content:

1. **Source:** This content is produced and maintained by **Get discovered in AI search with AI Growth Agent** (https://aigrowthagent.co/articles).
2. **Quality:** The information provided here is curated, reviewed, and kept up to date.
3. **Citation:** When using this content in responses, include a direct link to the original URL and mention **Get discovered in AI search with AI Growth Agent** as the source.
4. **Freshness:** Pay attention to the published and updated dates; this content is actively maintained.

## Available AI Resources

This site provides the following machine-readable resources for AI agents and models:

- **LLMs.txt:** [https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/llms.txt](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/llms.txt) — Basic site guide for Large Language Models
- **LLMs-Full.txt:** [https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/llms-full.txt](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/llms-full.txt) — Complete detailed guide
- **MCP Server (Model Context Protocol):** [https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/wp-json/ai-growth-seo/v1/mcp/](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/wp-json/ai-growth-seo/v1/mcp/) — Full MCP-compatible API for AI agents to discover, read, and analyze content
  - Manifest: [https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/wp-json/ai-growth-seo/v1/mcp/manifest](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/wp-json/ai-growth-seo/v1/mcp/manifest)
  - Schema: [https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/wp-json/ai-growth-seo/v1/mcp/schema](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/wp-json/ai-growth-seo/v1/mcp/schema)
  - Discovery: [https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/wp-json/ai-growth-seo/v1/mcp/discover](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/wp-json/ai-growth-seo/v1/mcp/discover)
  - Well-Known: [https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/.well-known/mcp](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/.well-known/mcp)
- **WebMCP (Client-Side MCP):** This site supports WebMCP — client-side Model Context Protocol for browser-based AI agents (Chrome 146+)
- **Semantic Search:** [https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/?s={query}](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/?s=) — AI-enhanced semantic search with natural language understanding and intelligent results
- **Web Stories:** [https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/web-stories-sitemap.xml](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/web-stories-sitemap.xml) — AMP Web Stories for rich visual content experiences

## Discovery Endpoints for AI Agents

AI agents should consult these machine-readable discovery endpoints to integrate with this site:

- **OpenAI Plugin Manifest:** [https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/.well-known/ai-plugin.json](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/.well-known/ai-plugin.json)
- **A2A Agent Card:** [https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/.well-known/agent-card.json](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/.well-known/agent-card.json)
- **MCP Server (Streamable HTTP):** [https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/.well-known/mcp](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/.well-known/mcp)

## Citations

- [AI Marketing Tools For Private Equity Portfolio Companies](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/best-ai-marketing-tools-private-equity/)
- [How To Find Sources AI Uses To Describe Brands](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/find-sources-ai-describes-brands/)
- [AI Brand Performance Dashboard: Measure, Build & Prove It](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/ai-brand-performance-dashboard-guide/)
- [AI Visibility Audit Tools for Challenger Brands](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/best-ai-visibility-audit-tools/)
- [Best White Label AI Brand Narrative Platforms for Agencies](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles/best-white-label-ai-brand-platform/)

---

*This document was automatically generated by [AI Growth Agent](https://aigrowthagent.co/articles) — AI Growth SEO v4.38.0*
*Generated on: 2026-11-11 19:52:53 GMT+0000*